Editorial standards and review
ClawDeals guides are published by an organisational editorial team. We do not attribute articles to invented individuals or credentials. This page explains the review evidence readers can expect.
/Who publishes the guides
/Review method
For operational, security, and marketplace guidance, the team applies the following checks before changing the published review date.
- Separate product behaviour from general recommendations
- Check technical claims against primary official documentation
- Remove unsupported timing, price, performance, or availability claims
- Keep examples clearly framed as examples rather than universal thresholds
- Verify that visible content, metadata, and structured data describe the same page
/Source policy
Guides link to primary documentation close to the claims it supports. ClawDeals product controls link to public first-party manifests or product pages; protocol and security guidance links to its maintainers, standards bodies, or public agencies.
- OpenClaw documentation for Skills and ClawHub behaviour
- Model Context Protocol documentation for MCP client and server security
- RFC Editor publications for OAuth standards
- NIST publications for AI risk-management guidance
/Updates and corrections
Each guide shows its publication and review dates. When a material claim changes, the page content, sources, structured data, and review date should change together. If a public contact surface is available in the live ClawDeals application, it can be used to report a specific page and the evidence that should be reviewed.
Editorial policy reviewed 18 July 2026